Salmon across Alaska Getting Smaller, Impacting People and Ecosystems
Yukon Drainage Fisheries Development Association technician Mark Tucker checks a set net in the lower Yukon River test fishery near Emmonak.
Salmon species across Alaska are returning to spawn at a smaller size, according to a study led by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
The study, published today in the journal Nature Communication, shows that body sizes are declining in four species of Pacific salmon because the fish are returning younger than they used to. The consequences of this trend will impact the people who rely on salmon for food, the commercial fishing industry and the health of ecosystems.
The researchers found that climate and competition for food at sea are important factors in body-size declines, but their impacts on salmon varies among species and location.
“We wanted to take a step back and look across the whole state, across different species, and get a feel for what was going on with salmon size at a broad scale,” said Krista Oke, the lead researcher on the project and a postdoctoral fellow at the UAF College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences.
Oke was part of a working group of academics, tribal advocates and state and federal biologists that analyzed 12.5 million samples collected by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game between 1957 and 2018. This massive 60-year database included age and length information for four species of Pacific salmon—Chinook (king), chum (keta or dog), coho (silver), and sockeye (red). The mature fish, caught on their way to spawn, were individually measured at escapement projects, commercial fisheries, and other places.
“This is a unique opportunity in that we were able to look across regions, across species and across time,” said CFOS assistant professor Curry Cunningham. The results of the synthesis of age and length data showed that all four species of salmon are returning to freshwater at a smaller size than they did historically.
“For the first time, we understand that is very much driven by the fish tending to be younger,” said Peter Westley, associate professor at CFOS and principal investigator of the study.
The magnitude of declines varied among regions and species. The largest species of Pacific salmon, Chinook, showed the highest average body size decline at 8 percent, compared to declines of 3.3 percent for coho, 2.4 percent for chum, and 2.1 percent for sockeye. For all four species, the rate of decline has accelerated since 2010.
Salmon size has declined dramatically over the past sixty years. Size declines have occurred across species and are generally associated with decreasing age.
The consequences of smaller returning salmon reach far and wide. The study is unique in that it translates changes in salmon size into something more tangible. For example, Chinook salmon showed reductions of 16 percent in egg production, 28 percent in nutrient transport back to rivers, 21 percent in fisheries value, and 26 percent in meals for Alaskans.
“The Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim area is the biggest subsistence user group in the country,” said co-author Gale Vick, a former commercial fisherman representing the Tanana Chiefs Conference tribal consortium. “The dependency of that group on the resource is huge. It’s not just a commercial dependency—it’s a food security issue.”
Become an Industry Sponsor
The researchers looked at hypothetical causes of the size declines, including warming oceans, increases in wild and hatchery salmon abundance, and size-selective fishing. Both climate and competition appear to be influencing salmon body size, but their impacts varied across species.
Data to test the role of selective fishing was only available for a few species in a few regions. With this limited information, the study did not suggest a key role of fishing on salmon body-size declines. However, “At the very least, selective fishing against the biggest fish is not helping,” Westley said.
The group hopes that the study can help focus future research. “What this shows very clearly is that protecting freshwater habitats alone is not sufficient to avoid changes like what we are seeing. There has to be more recognition in the role of a shared ocean,” said Westley.
The working group behind the study was organized by the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis. The work was funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and Nautilus Impact Investing.
In This Issue
The Corporate 100
Alaska Business has been celebrating the corporations that have a significant impact on Alaska’s economy since 1993. At the time, the corporations weren’t ranked as the list didn’t have specific ranking criteria. Instead, the Alaska Business editorial team held long, detailed, and occasionally passionate discussions about which organizations around the state were providing jobs, owned or leased property, used local vendors, demonstrated a high level of community engagement, and in general enriched Alaska.