1. HOME
  2.  | 
  3. Column
  4.  | The Focused Manager: Wired, but not Rearranged

The Focused Manager: Wired, but not Rearranged

by | Nov 14, 2026 | Column, Guest Author, Professional Services, Telecom & Tech

AdobeStock_415487748

Photo Credit: Seventyfour| Adobe Stock

Picture a factory in 1900. One steam engine drove shafts, with belts running between floors. Buildings were designed around the power system, and machines were positioned where belts could reach them.

Then electricity arrived, and many plants did the obvious thing. They added electric motors but left the rest of the system alone. The shafts and belts stayed, and the machines stayed organized in rows dictated in part by how mechanical power reached them. Even Ford’s state-of-the-art Highland Park plant, which began production in 1910, ran electric drive equipment alongside conventional shafting and belting.

The Engine Got Smaller

The bigger transformation happened when electric motors moved closer to the machine. With individual motors, machines could go where the work was. The floor no longer had to be arranged around the shafting. It could be arranged around the way the work was done.

This was a harder change. Replacing a power source was one thing, but redesigning a working factory meant stopping production, moving equipment, and betting the new layout would pay off. With no way to test the new layout first, profitable factories didn’t rush.

Fast forward to today, and AI is the smaller engine. A steam engine was a company decision, backed by capital, buildings, and engineers. A subscription is a manager’s decision, and it’s small enough to put where the work happens.

A factory had to redesign the whole floor at once. A manager can change one step of one process, see what happens, and go from there. Managers can start rearranging the floor right now.

AI creates the potential. Management builds the value.

Current Issue

Alaska Business Magazine November 2026 cover

November 2026

This One Belongs to Managers

Managers know how to deal with change. When budgets get cut, a system gets replaced, or someone quits mid-project, managers figure out how to handle it. They are like shock absorbers, and they know it’s part of the job.

So it’s tempting to look at AI and see it as another change to absorb.

But this is different. Change used to arrive as a package. A vendor was selected, a budget and schedule set, and the manager’s job was to get the team through it. Absorbing change made sense because the decision had already been made. Managers made it work.

With AI, most managers aren’t getting a package with a spec, a training plan, and a rollout schedule. Nobody has decided how the workflow changes. That’s open, and the manager is the one positioned to decide. This isn’t a change to absorb. It’s a change to lead.

And that’s why this is the manager’s job.

Executives think about departments, service lines, and the business as a whole. Managers think about their people. They know who is struggling and who is on an upward trajectory. They know the potential that exists on the team.

Vendors think about use cases and subscriptions. Managers see the small things that make the business run. They know about the report that takes six hours of manual edits to get right, and the customer who stays because of a personal relationship.

Managers know how the operational systems really work. They have visibility into the strategy, yet experience the daily pressures firsthand. No one else has as diverse and intimate an understanding of the people, the processes, and the systems as managers.

The value of AI is created where the work gets done, the same place the motor ended up. A manager’s floor is the team, its processes, and its systems.

Rearranging all of that takes someone who knows all three. It takes the manager.
Most have not started.

Making time for AI doesn’t start with a strategy or a proposal to the boss. Instead, it starts with a small bet. The manager identifies one place to try saving time with AI. But the place to look isn’t at the task level; it’s at the process level.

Why Managers Haven’t Started

Starting is the hardest part. Three objections come up most often.

“I don’t know where to start, or which tool to use.”

There’s a lot of hype about which platform is best or which tool is hot. But most of that only matters to investors. For a manager leading a team, it’s more important to just pick one and start. If the company has a preferred tool, use that. If not, choose one and practice good hygiene. Keep all confidential data out of it and don’t give it access to company resources.

“My company bought a tool and told us to use it. Nothing changed.”

Companies bolted the electric motor onto the existing shaft, and nothing changed until the floor got rearranged. That’s the work of the manager. This objection is the clearest evidence that it is time to start.

“I don’t have time.”

This is true. Managers are too busy, and that’s the diagnosis. Nobody made time to rearrange a factory that was making money, and nobody is going to make time for managers to learn to use AI. AI is how you find the time.

Place a Small Bet

Making time for AI doesn’t start with a strategy or a proposal to the boss. Instead, it starts with a small bet. The manager identifies one place to try saving time with AI. But the place to look isn’t at the task level; it’s at the process level.

What are the regular processes that the manager or the team runs on a daily or weekly basis? These are things like the new request intake process, review cycles before releasing work, or weekly reporting. Managers who can’t put company data into AI can use it for their own routines instead. Look at processes such as weekly planning, catching up on industry news, or turning meeting notes into follow-up items.

Choose a process and walk through the steps. Identify one step in the process that takes extra time or often gets stuck. That’s where the first small bet goes. That’s where to put AI in the loop.

It might be a step that summarizes or reformats information. It could be drafting a report or pulling together the list of work to prioritize for the week. Whatever it is, work out how AI could make that step easier, faster, or better.

Before making any changes, state the desired outcome. For instance, if the goal is time, state how many hours the bet might save if it pays off. If it is an improvement in quality, state what that looks like.

Then, make the bet. Reconfigure the step to use AI. Not sure how? Ask AI. Set up the step, run the process with AI in the loop, and evaluate the results against the goal. It probably won’t pay off big, but it gets things moving. From there, make adjustments and make another small bet.

For example, a manager who spends half an hour each morning reading industry news might have AI do the scan overnight and create a short list that takes a few minutes to digest. The next bet can be about getting those items into the CRM, so staff know what clients are dealing with.

Keep Rearranging

One bet gets a manager started, but it won’t rearrange the floor. To do that, managers must keep placing bets and improving their processes with AI. Then they can invest their time and energy in the things only they can do.

This might be spending more time talking with key customers or building stronger vendor relationships. It can be improving cross-departmental collaboration, so work moves more smoothly across the organization. Or it can be spending extra time mentoring a high-potential employee and building a stronger leadership pipeline.

Managers are also leading their teams through this change. How the team hears their manager talk about it, respond to it, and use it will influence how the team uses AI. Bring AI use out into the open, and normalize experimentation. Managers should talk about what they’re trying, what is and isn’t working, and what they’re learning through it all.

Finally, managers must regularly update their boss about the bets they are making and what they are learning. The boss will want to know how steps are selected, how risk is managed, and what results these experiments show. The boss is accountable for those processes and can help keep the bets pointed at what the business needs.

How do managers lead through this change? By doing things only they can do, bringing their teams along, and engaging their boss.

The motor will get added. It isn’t a question of if, but when. Rearranging the floor is different, and that’s what matters. It starts with managers, and it starts now. The technology arrived. The value is still waiting on us.

Brian Walch helps Alaska companies keep the people they have and grow the leaders they need through coaching and consulting that build the management systems to make it possible. Learn more at shiftfocus.com.

 

Alaska Business Magazine November 2026 cover
In This Issue
The Dalton Can’t Wait
November 2026
From the Community Winter Access Trail to the Pan-American Highway, from the Willow and Pikka projects to the proposed Ambler Access Road, the Dalton Highway is a lifeline to the top of North America. But despite fifty years of improvements, unevenly thawing permafrost and an uncertain financial foundation have frayed the North Slope’s road to the rest of the world.
Share This