HOME | Monitor | McDowell Group Study Shows $4.8 Billion in Public, Private Oil and Gas Sector Payroll in 2018

McDowell Group Study Shows $4.8 Billion in Public, Private Oil and Gas Sector Payroll in 2018

Jan 29, 2020 | Monitor

ANCHORAGE—In a presentation to Alaska State Legislators and staff, Donna Logan, vice president of the McDowell Group, released the updated The Role of the Oil and Gas Industry in Alaska’s Economy. McDowell Group prepared the economic impact study on behalf of the Alaska Oil and Gas Association (AOGA), which commissions the study every few years. 

Key findings include:

  • In 2018, Alaska’s oil and gas industry’s total impact (including multiplier effects) accounted for 77,600 jobs in Alaska, and $4.8 billion in Alaska wages.
  • Alaska residents represent 84 percent of primary company total employment in Alaska.
  • For every primary company job, another eight jobs are supported by primary company activity in Alaska, and seven more jobs supported by oil-related taxes and royalties payments to the State of Alaska.
  • For each dollar earned by employees of the primary companies, a total of $4 in additional indirect and induced wages are generated in Alaska.
  • The oil and gas industry paid $3.1 billion in state and local taxes and royalties in State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2019, including $2.7 billion to state government, and $449 million to local governments.


McDowell Group analyzed not only the economic impact of oil company spending on employment and wages in Alaska’s private sector, but also the impact resulting from state and local government spending of taxes and royalties paid by the oil and gas industry. 

“Alaska’s oil and gas companies are proud to contribute to Alaska’s economy and quality of life,” said Kara Moriarty, AOGA president and CEO. “When our industry thrives, our state benefits in many ways—from funding essential services, to employing Alaskans, to contributing to the health of the Permanent Fund. As the data shows, Alaska’s oil and gas industry remains the single most important economic engine in the state, and we are proud of the work we do to benefit all Alaskans.”

To conduct the study, the McDowell Group team independently collected data from a variety of sources, including spending and payroll data from the following seventeen “primary companies”:

  • Alaska Gasline Development Corporation (AGDC)
  • Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
  • BlueCrest Energy
  • BP Alaska
  • Brooks Range Petroleum
  • Chevron
  • ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
  • Eni Petroleum
  • ExxonMobil Production Company
  • Furie Operating Alaska
  • Glacier Oil and Gas
  • Hilcorp Alaska
  • Marathon Petroleum
  • Oil Search Alaska
  • Petro Star Inc.
  • Repsol E&P USA
  • Shell Exploration & Production Company


Many of the companies were able to provide detailed financial information, including the amount of money spent with specific Alaska companies, job counts, payroll information by both place of work and place of residence, and amounts paid in state and local taxes. 

Data collected for studying the public sector employment impact was provided by the Alaska Department of Labor and Workplace Development; the Alaska Department of Revenue; the Alaska Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development; the US Bureau of Labor Statistics; the US Bureau of Economic Analysis, and the US Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration, among others.

Other highlights of the economic study include local and regional impacts for the Municipality of Anchorage; Fairbanks North Star Borough; Kenai Peninsula Borough; Matanuska-Susitna Borough; North Slope Borough; and the City of Valdez, as well as specific, detailed oil revenue impacts on state and local government programs. 

A full copy of the report is available on AOGA’s website, along with a Frequently Asked Questions document and PowerPoint presentation prepared by the McDowell Group.

Current Issue

Alaska Business March 2021 Cover

March 2021

Alaska Business Magazine March 2021 cover

In This Issue

Hardware Hangs In

March 2021

Turns out, predicting the effects of a pandemic on a global economy is kind of impossible. In the midst of the uncertainty, those companies that crumbled and those that found ways to thrive seemed random at times, depending on local economies, access to financial aid, the unpredictability of consumers, changing regulations, and a little bit of “who knows.”

Share This