Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags

Alaska Chamber reinforces position on achieving sustainable state government


Anchorage, AK – On Friday, April 15, the Alaska Chamber spoke in opposition to House Bill 249; an omnibus bill proposing steep increases to taxes on motor fuel and the fishing and mining industries. The Chamber supports reductions to Unrestricted General Fund Spending to $4.5 billion, and Alaskan companies from Ketchikan to Barrow insist that spending be brought in line before the State burdens industry with new taxes.

With lawmakers focused on a broad slate of poorly understood tax increases, State spending continues to spiral upward. Alarmingly, big-ticket spending items – like union labor contracts – are poised to pass without adequate review from legislators.

Testifying in opposition to House Bill 249, Chamber President and CEO Curtis W. Thayer brought the Finance Committee’s focus back to sustainable State spending.

Thayer said, “House Finance held a hearing back in March where representatives expressed serious concern about the overwhelming size of automatic pay increases for public employees while Alaska companies are rapidly constricting.”

Public employee contracts promise pay increases ranging from 3.25 to 10.5 percent for 12,000 State employees. Thayer said, “They’re trying to fill a $4 billion dollar budget gap by hammering fishing and mining with $49 million in new taxes. Meanwhile, another $70 million in pay raises just widens the gap.”

Building a sustainable state government is a responsibility that must be shared by all Alaskans; public and private. Alaska’s principal industry has already lost more than 3,000 jobs this year. Juneau’s singular focus on increasing taxes is indicative of a continued unwillingness to participate in creating a government Alaska can afford.

Copies of Chamber testimony and advocacy positions are available online at alaskachamber.com. The Chamber believes spending must be brought in line while Alaska's savings are still available as a resource. To that end, we support efforts to:

  1. Reduce the State’s operating budget to a sustainable level;
  2. Create an endowment model or similar framework to use Permanent Fund earnings to support essential services; and
  3. Only then explore introductions of new, broad-based taxes, if needed. It is inappropriate for the State to burden a receding private sector with the yoke of spiraling public spending. Union contracts – like all State programs and services – should be subject to the full review and scrutiny of the public process.

“The public won’t support a host of new taxes,” Thayer said. “Not while the State is handing out double digit raises. How can they when their friends and family members are losing their jobs?”


Edit Module

Add your comment: