Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags

4-13-12 Debunking Detractors


Chenault opposes Senate committee rewrite of in-state gas pipeline billMike Chenault, Alaska Speaker of the House, Photo by Dave Harbour - The Republic.

House Speaker Chenault told the Senate Community and Regional Affairs Committee that its rewrite of HB9 "neutered" the ability of the Alaska Gasline Development Corp., or AGDC, to advance a project. And he said it reinserts politics into efforts to bring a gas line ...
See all stories on this topic »

Debunking Detractors

Commentary by

Dave Harbour

Yesterday (Scroll down) we complimented the Anchorage Daily Planet for outing the "It's Our Oil" crowd, whose web presence is "Stand Up Alaska" (SOA, also intitials for State of Alaska).  The group seeks to detract from efforts to reform Alaska taxes in an effort to improve Alaska's investment climate.

Our investigation led us to one of the "facts" upon which the group bases its opposition to Governor Sean Parnell's tax reform package passed by the House last year (i.e. HB 110), withering in the Senate this year in favor of an unimpressive Senate tax reform bill, SB 192. 

SOA's website quotes from a Tax Foundation chart indicating that Alaska's Business Climate is Second Best In the Nation.  The link SOA gives leads only to a chart, not to any narrative describing the study.  

We found that narrative on the Tax Foundation's website, right here.  To assure that our NGP readers are not misled by SOA arguments like this, we will offer several "Fact Checks".

Overall Rank
Corporate Tax Rank
Individual Income Tax Rank
Sales Tax Rank
Unemployment Insurance Tax Rank
Property Tax Rank
Alaska 4 27 1 5 28 13
  • SOA's website states that  Alaska's Business Climate is Second Best In the Nation,  whereas The Tax Foundation website places Alaska in 4th place out of the 50 states in the "Best States Index".
  • Alaska received the 4th place out of 50 prize based on these criteria.   
  • The study criteria ranks Alaska's corporate income tax in the middle range at 27, not exactly attractive.
  • Since Alaska has no personal income tax, we get the highest mark of 1, attractive to individual workers but not to those who have to make up the difference.
  • Since Alaska has no statewide sales tax, but a few local sales taxes, it gets a very high mark of 5.
  • As to unemployment insurance tax, we are far from the top at 28, not very attractive to business investment.  
  • With no general state property tax rate and only several local property taxes counted, we rank at 13, not bad but not great.
  • Alaska's discriminatory oil and gas property tax was not included in the study, apparently, and if it had been our property tax rank would have been much worse than 13.
  • Alaska's predatory and changing production tax was not apparently included in the study though it is one of the major sources of revenue to the state.  If it had been included, Alaska would have ranked much lower as a business investment haven.

Our conclusion:  The tax reform detractors should use accurate information to support their arguments.  Our readers now know that the Tax Foundation used general criteria common to most states but when applied to Alaska far overestimates the attractiveness of Alaska's investment climate--especially from the viewpoint of large natural resource industry investors (i.e. and the rest of us who depend on those large investor to support the economy and state services for the rest of us).

Edit Module

Add your comment: